Page 1 of 1: PGMCET-06:FINAL CHANCE 2 GET A PG SEAT IN THIS ACEDEMIC YEAR

pktk · Credits: 6131 My Scrapbook

Dear friends,
You may be aware of or not that there is a case still pending in the Hon. Supreme court regarding the 4th round of the Maharashtra PGMCET 2006 councelling.
The case was filed earlier in the Hon. High court on 28th june, i.e. before the cut off date 30th sept. to avoid loss of the valuable PG seats dut to cancellation or not joining of students to the courses alloted to them in third round.
Hon. High Court Said that it cannot interfere in this matter as the cut off date was decided by Hon. Supreme court and advised to appeal for the same in Supreme Court.
Now we have our case in Supreme Court and we are getting only further dates of hearing as our ADVOCATE for this case is not strong.
WE are with the hope to win the case as a total of 96 seats are getting lapsed. And in emergency and exceptional cases MCI can extend joining/councelling upto 3 months after cut off date.
For the same reason U.P. had made admissions after the cut off date on 5th july with permission of MCI through Supreme COURT.
We have less than a month in our hand So that 4th round is implimented, DMER is also ready to take 4th round before 30th sep. if Court permits as they have submitted their Affidavit to Sup. Court
Reply from MCI is not recieved yet and thats why our case is getting delayed.
We need a strong ADVOCATE which can resolve this matter in the stipulated time, So anybody can help out or Knows any good Supreme court advocate please get in touch.

pktk · Credits: 6131 My Scrapbook

The list of vacancy position along with the SML of those students who have not joined the Alloted Course before 30th june is pasted herewith.
PGM CET2006
VACANCY POSITION AFTER 30/06/2006
College name Sml Subject Vacancy Status Total
GMC MUMBAI AI DMRD 1 CANCELLED 9
123 MD MEDICINE 1 NJ
1943 MS Anatomy 1 NJ
1143 MD Microbiology 1 NJ
1710 MD FMT 1 NJ
962 DA
DA 2 NJ
1111 NJ
2675 DFM
DFM 2 NJ
3029 NJ
SETH GSMC MUMBAI 1655 MS Anatomy 1 NJ 3
1125 MD PSM 1 NJ
869 DA 1 NJ
TNMC MUMBAI 3282 MS Anatomy 1 NJ 13
2057 MD Physiology 1 NJ
1248 MD PSM 1 NJ
894 DPM 1 NJ
1030 DA
DA
DA 3 NJ
1653 NJ
1480 NJ
732 DGO 1 CANCELLED
2422 DPH
DPH
DPH
DPH 4 NJ
2463 NJ
3277 NJ
1799 CANCELLED
788 DD 1 NJ
BJMC PUNE AI MD MEDICINE 1 RESIGNED 7
1655 MD Pathology 1 NJ
1068 DA 1 NJ
3132 DPH 1 NJ
827 DCP
DCP
DCP 3 NJ
1346 NJ
3356 NJ
VMMC SOLAPUR 1076 MD Pharmacology 2 NJ 6
1589 MD Microbiology 1 NJ
735 DGO 1 NJ
1621 DORL 1 NJ
1076 DCP
DCP 2 NJ
1723 NJ
TATA HOSPITAL 439 MD RADIOTHERAPY 1 NJ 3
486 MD RADIOTHERAPY 1 NJ
1324 DA 1 NJ
GMC NANDED 1597 MD PSM 1 NJ 2
902 MD Pathology 1 NJ
GMC MIRAJ 2445 MD Physiology 1 NJ 7
2707 DPH
DPH 2 NJ
2750 NJ
1728 DCP
DCP
DCP
DCP 4 NJ
1773 NJ
1878 NJ
2078 NJ
GMC NAGPUR 282 MS SURGERY 2 NJ 6
1623 MD Biochemistry 1 NJ
675 DGO 1 NJ
3139 DPH 1 NJ
807 D. OPHTHAL 1 NJ
353 MS Ophthalmology 1 NJ
IGGMC NAGPUR 809 MS ENT 1 NJ 7
600 MD ANASTHESIA 1 NJ
1777 MD PSM 1 NJ
1437 MD Pathology 1 NJ
1180 DA 1 NJ
769 DGO 1 NJ
921 D.OPHTHAL 1 NJ
GMC AURANGABAD 2182 MS Anatomy 1 NJ 11
1617 MD Biochemistry 1 NJ
1257 MD Microbiology 1 NJ
AI MD MEDICINE 1 CANCELLED
1602 DCP
DCP 2 NJ
2049 NJ
3081 DFM 1 NJ
1148 DA 1 NJ
607 DCH 1 NJ
884 D.OPHTHAL 1 NJ
1615 DORL 1 NJ
SRTR AMBAJOGY 419 MS Ophthalmology 1 NJ 6
2345 MD Physiology 1 NJ
1140 MD Pharmacology 1 NJ
1436 DA 1 NJ
2780 DPH 1 NJ
5406 DCP 1 NJ
LTMC MUMBAI - - - - -
- - - -
82
******************************************************
AI= All India
NJ= Not Joined
******************************************************
Some other seats which were cancelled later are
AI... GMC MUMBAI...MD PATH....1....CANCELLED
AI...GSMC MUMBAI..MD MICRO..1....CANCELLED
..SRTR AMBAJOGAI..MS ENT .......1....CANCELLED

pktk · Credits: 6131 My Scrapbook

our case detail are available on web site "www,courtnic.nic.in"
in this 1st go to sup. court case status, then click case no.
then type in case type- special leave petition(civil)
then type case number- 12183 yr 2006
then submeet.
u will get all infomation regarding new date, previous dates.

pktk · Credits: 6131 My Scrapbook

i am herewith giving a copy of petition

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 12183 OF 2006

IN THE MATTER OF:
Maharashtra Association of
Residents Doctors, Pune ….Petitioner
//Versus//
State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….Respondents

REJOINDER AFFIDAVIT OF PETITIONER

I, Dr. Rahuldeo Madhukar Wagh, Age major, Occ: Student, R/o Pune, Maharashtra , presently at New Delhi do hereby state on solemn affirmation as under that:
1. I am the authorized representative of Petitioner-Association, well conversant with the facts of the case and hence competent to swear this rejoinder affidavit.
2. I have read the contents of the counter affidavit of the respondents and in reply to the same, I am filing this rejoinder affidavit only for the purpose to oppose the same and I further reiterates the contents of the List of Dates and contents of the Special Leave Petition as a part and parcel of this rejoinder affidavit for the sake of brevity and convenience. I further reserve my rights to file detailed affidavit, if required at a later stage with the kind permission of this Hon’ble Court.
3. I submit that the of Petitioner-Maharashtra Association of Residents Doctors, Pune deals with the problem of resident doctors and the matters related to post graduate education. Regarding this petition, I would like to point out that the exact number of post graduate seats which are likely to go waste is around 120, though earlier it was accepted to be around 80, as some seats are not mentioned in the earlier affidavit. So this figure of vacant seats comes around 20 to 22 % (120 out of 535).
4. In my respectful submission, I would further like to point out certain misleading points of the affidavit, that was put forth by the respondent, a before the honorable court as a reply in this petition.
5. It is claimed by the respondent that the vacancies are created due to reasons attributable to the students who rejected the seat, however this is not the fact, as vacancies are due to inefficient admission procedure adapted by DMER, and thus the responsibility of filing those seats lies totally on DMER, as there are still number of eligible candidates waiting down the merit list to get those seats.
6. To explain, in previous method of counseling (face to face counseling), if the student who has already taken seat through All India Quota, leaves the same for better option available in state quota, that particular seat was used to be made immediately available to the next eligible candidate in the same round. Therefore there was no such question of seats remaining vacant due to any action on behalf of students.
7. But in present counseling method (Preferences filing system) if any student from All India Quota leaves the seat for better option available through state quota in last round then such seat will remain vacant forever, unless the authority conducts another round.
8. For this year, when the third round was conducted between 26 to 30th June 2006, no compulsion was made by respondent on the student to continue the seats allotted to prevent possible vacancies and wastage of seats, neither the students were given any option to resign the seat before a due date so that possible vacancies could have been avoided before the deadline of admission.
9. Ultimately, in this scenario, the responsibility lies on DMER, and it is itself evident that procedure adapted is faulty as it is creating so many vacancies (20%) in spite of so many eligible candidates awaiting admission.
10. Further, whatever may be the reason for vacancies, it is ultimately responsibility of the respondent to make sure that there should not be so many vacancies at the end of due date.
11. As mentioned in the orders passed by this honorable court in the matter of Mridul Dhar Vs Union of India (2005) SCC 65 (paragraph F of page 71).
“ It is necessary to adhere to the schedule so the remaining unfilled seats can be reverted and be filled by the state and only bare minimum number of seats may lapse, the state shall also take timely action so that the seats to a great extent may not lapse.”
12. Hence, I would like to bring to the attention of this honorable court the amount of seats which are going to lapse is more than 20% of the total seats available, which definitely can not be called as “bare minimum” even in gross words and respondent had failed to take timely action to fill up the vacant seats, as it clearly evident.
13. As it is persistently claimed by the respondent in the affidavit that the procedure adopted by them for admission, is very transparent and single window system. I respectfully would like to bring to the attention of this honorable court that, I had never raised questions about transparency of procedure; I firmly reiterate that the procedure is seriously inefficient.
14. The selection list for third round was declared on 26 June 2006 and students were asked to join on or before 30 June 2006. In this scenario the respondent is claiming that, if there were any vacancies arising after this round, would have been identified only on 1 July 2006, which is post due date of 30 June 2006. But I respectfully submit that the extent of wastage of seats would have been limited if the respondent would have scheduled the third round dates somewhat earlier by two or three days thus creating opportunity for one more round within due date.
15. For unknown reasons, the last date of joining for private medical colleges was 29 th June 2006 while the same for govt college was 30 June 2006. Thus the private colleges had one more day to fill up the vacancies before the deadline, while the govt institutions were denied such opportunity.
16. In last year for 2005 – 2006 on 29 may 2005 morning candidates were asked to fill fresh preferences form, on the same day evening new selection list was displayed and on the same day night candidates were asked to join colleges on next day. This is an example to show that how fast the respondent can act if they desire. This is very contrary to their present statement which claims that it was not possible for them to fill the seats at 11th hour.
17. As a representative of Maharashtra Association of Resident Doctors, I would like to bring to the attention of this honorable court, the very important fact that these postgraduate seats are the backbone of the huge infrastructure of medical colleges and hospitals, which forms tertiary level of healthcare system throughout the state which is basically run for healthcare of common people. So with such kind of seat wastages the infrastructure is likely to suffer.
18. Furthermore, this will be serious injustice to the student who study rigorously for 2-3 years after their degree completion and in spite of holding a good rank in the merit list, are denied the admission. Solely because of faulty procedure adopted by the authorities.
19. Finally, I would like to summarize as a) The likely number of the seats wasted is approximately 120, which more than 20%of the total available seats. b) The affidavit filed by DMER is misleading. c) Respondent is solely responsible for the seat wastage and not the students. d) It was possible from the respondent to minimize the wastage by properly planned and timely action which the respondent failed to take. e) With such huge number vacancies the healthcare infrastructure is likely to suffer and final brunt will be on poor patients. f) These vacant seats will be severe injustice to the students holding good ranks, still waiting for admission.
20. Certified that no new facts have been stated in this rejoinder affidavit.

DEPONENT
(DR. RAHULDEO MADHUKAR WAGH)
VERIFICATION
I, Mr. Rahuldeo S/o Madhukar Wagh, age Major, Occ: Student, R/o Pune, Maharashtra , presently at New Delhi do hereby state on solemn affirmation that the contents of the above rejoinder affidavit in paragraph Nos.1 to 20 are true and correct to my knowledge and belief.
Hence verified at New Delhi on this 23rd day of August, 2006.

DEPONENT
(DR. RAHULDEO MADHUKAR WAGH)

humtum · Credits: 179 My Scrapbook

hi friends,
i saw the vacancy list,there r so many precious seats going 2 b wasted.
so lets fight and support d people struggling for 4th round to happen.
For d same-CONTACT D FOLLOWING NUMBERS 4 CONTRIBUTION AND FURTHER DETAILS-
Dr.Balaji (Nair mumbai)-9224769746
Dr.Swapna(JJ mumbai)-9324128220
Dr.shailesh(nagpur) -[snip]
Dr.Reshma(Nair mumbai)-[snip]
Dr.Amit(BJ pune) -9226934208

zolt · Credits: 9209 My Scrapbook My Reading List 40 Books

the deadline has passed. what is the latest on this case?

pktk · Credits: 6131 My Scrapbook

we have lost the case

atharvaa · Credits: 478 My Scrapbook

can u pls tell me if these seats that went vacant will be made availaable to us in the 4th round

		Sign In New User? Sign Up Sign in to access your control panel and messenger!
				TechZone \| SpiderNevi \| HowTo? \| Scrapbook!