|
Author
|
Message
|
moscow
Credits:
1842
My Scrapbook
|
march 2007
|
03.26.07 (1 year ago)
#1
|
|
|
how was the march 2007 exam.can u pls explain the pattern.and distribution of marks subjectwise.
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
gauravela
Credits:
130
My Scrapbook
|
|
03.26.07 (1 year ago)
#2
|
|
|
questions were a bit tough. straight questions bahot kam the.
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
velocity80
Credits:
935
My Scrapbook
|
|
03.27.07 (1 year ago)
#3
|
|
i think the guys who made the paper were obviously pissed of at something or the other,and the reflection was easily seen in the question papers.and i'm especially talking about the 1st part.I mean questions from SPM concerning past stats,this is how they actually test the basic knowledge of a doctor.i personally feel that this exam was a joke on the face of all FMGE
's,though i DO think the 2nd part was fair enough.i'd like to think that i was well prepared for the exam but one look at the 1st part made me think that i don't know anything.No questions from Biochemistry
,Physiology
was also missing to a great extent and Anatomy
questions were way too tough.
If the guys from MCI and NAtional Board of Examination r seeing this then please sirs,with all due respect,please be a little fair on the FMGE
's.
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
quaintlee
Credits:
1850
My Scrapbook
|
|
03.30.07 (1 year ago)
#4
|
|
The first paper was difficult - Mainly Anatomy
, Ophthalmology
and SPM. I think most people fared badly in this part.
The second paper was a mixture. Easier than the first part, but still no cakewalk.
Hardly any Biochemistry
. Only one or two questions from Psychiatry
It would be difficult to give you and exact breakup subject wise, but you can get a rough idea from the questions we've posted on another thread. You can check them here
There were quite a few printing mistakes in the question paper. Another reflection of the carelessness with which MCI is treating the whole issue.
The answers had to be marked with a pen. This created a lot of confusion as a lot of people made mistakes and later wanted to change their answers. Some people used ink erasers, some used whiteners. But it might have caused errors in the automated checking of the paper, and one can never say how many people failed because of this.
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|