Mobile (PDA) gre ielts gpvts mrcgp mrcog mrcp mrcpath mrcpch mrcs plab toefl usmle Forums FAQ | Help

RxPG - the perfect Rx for medical Post Graduate entrance blues!
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
Sign in to access your control panel and messenger!
 

TechZone | SpiderNevi | HowTo? | Scrapbook!

    

DocIndia Forum - Site Related Discussions - Shouts - Library - Lists - Categories  

 Revision Tools: Eponyms Facts Diseases Syndromes Pathognomics Images Crammer Vocabulary PreviousPapers OSCE Busters GRE
 Features Forums Articles Downloads Mnemonics Dictionary Reviews Videos Submit Articles

ZONES>> Hot : MBBS : PrePG : MCQs : Careers : Alt+C : UK : USA : Australia : Canada : Global : OffBeat!

 [ Customise this Navigation Bar ]

Alerts - Study Partner - Answers - Seat Reviews - I See - Search Forums | Top Reads Book Shop  

 
 Home > > Forums Email this page
RxPG :: View topic - Is there any Computer Mistake for PGM – CET 2008?  
 
Maharashtra Forum FAQ - Hot - Reviews - Unanswered
Page 1 of 1: Is there any Computer Mistake for PGM – CET 2008?
Thread Info | Related Topics | Wiki Page for This Topic | Topic Tags:
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version
 Page 1 of 1
Author Message
MHPGCETSend an Instant Message to MHPGCET  




Credits: 2950

My Scrapbook


Quick Scroll Is there any Computer Mistake for PGM – CET 2008? 02.08.08 (11 months ago) #1

Is there any Computer Mistake for PGM – CET 2008?

To all students who have appeared in PGM -CET 2008.

I feel that there is a computer reading mistake in the results of PGM-CET 2008.

Life of thousands of hard working MBBS graduates are at stake.


Please check your self & if not satisfied opt. for verification immediately.

This is purely my observation and I have mentioned it purely on humanity ground I do not intend to blame anybody and also I do not intend to hurt any feelings of present merit list holders.

Your Well wisher.

Edited by: RxPG Team
Edit Reason: Violation of TOS.


Please make sure that every poster maintains the decorum of a constructive discussion and avoids violating the RxPG Terms of Service in any way. The terms of service link is clearly displayed both on post and reply pages. For your reference it can be seen at
Only RxPG members can see links here! Register or Sign In!


We have all the posts by this member which violate TOS. The examples of such violation includes (but not limited to):

1. Mentioning specific ranks .
2. Naming specific individuals
3. posting of same info in various forums and threads
4. Moving into posts which has nothing to do with the main discussion and indulging in flaming.
Post Options: Add to favourite . Tell a friend .
Back to top

Top of page

vikas1000Send an Instant Message to vikas1000  




Credits: 3369

My Scrapbook


Quick Scroll 02.08.08 (11 months ago) #2

yes u r absolutely right.......
Post Options: Add to favourite . Tell a friend .
Back to top

Top of page

naduSend an Instant Message to nadu  




Credits: 17768

My Scrapbook


Quick Scroll 02.08.08 (11 months ago) #3

hey man acc to yr list the result appears fair.........since most of repeaters who have again studied for 1 more yr have got rank in first 50!
Post Options: Add to favourite . Tell a friend .
Back to top

Top of page

sonu26Send an Instant Message to sonu26  




Credits: 1116

My Scrapbook


Quick Scroll 02.08.08 (11 months ago) #4

its unfair to compare there previous ranks......but sure there is any comp mistake killing many of yes......i accept my failuri but .....then my marks are too low......a defference of 40-50 marks raises ques....pakka..
Post Options: Add to favourite . Tell a friend .
Back to top

Top of page

dip_83Send an Instant Message to dip_83  




Credits: 1295

My Scrapbook


Quick Scroll 02.09.08 (11 months ago) #5

KNOW UR CORRECT VERSION :




version 44 -- last two digits of ur roll number will be exactly divisible by 4




version 33 -- last 2 digits wil be 1 number less than a multiple of 4





version 11 -- last 2 digits wil be 1 number more than a multiple of 4





version 22 -- last 2 digits wil b an even number, other than multiple of 4




its ur roll number n not the application number,,,,,
Post Options: Add to favourite . Tell a friend .
Back to top

Top of page

MHPGCETSend an Instant Message to MHPGCET  




Credits: 2950

My Scrapbook


Quick Scroll Is there any Computer Mistake for PGM – CET 2008? 02.09.08 (11 months ago) #6

For e.g. The PGM CET Roll No. of your College Final year MBBS topper is 101 than see the rank of PGM CET Roll No. 100 or 102 you will be shocked to see that the rank of your college topper is way far behind than his previous or next Roll No. and now if you compare the past performance of (Roll No.100 or 102) you will be surprised.
Post Options: Add to favourite . Tell a friend .
Back to top

Top of page

preetigogriSend an Instant Message to preetigogri  




Credits: 223

My Scrapbook


Quick Scroll 02.09.08 (11 months ago) #7

just shut up n stop acting like a real looser. i tried telling u this even yes but u just seem to get worser. this is to u mhpgcet.
Post Options: Add to favourite . Tell a friend .
Back to top

Top of page

vikas1000Send an Instant Message to vikas1000  




Credits: 3369

My Scrapbook


Quick Scroll 02.09.08 (11 months ago) #8

hello pgmcet ur analysis is exactly right,.....
same thing happened with many people.....

preeti gori.....what is ur rank?????
why u r becoming so aggressive......
i think u r benefited by this.......
and...u just shut up..........

we still affirm that we don;t want to annoy someone....
there r genuine rankers also.....
and some people r given 25 to 30 marks less ....
we will take legal action against this.....
first send applications for revaluation....
lets flood the dmer office with lot of applications.....

don;t let ur morals down....
unite and fight against this injustice......
Post Options: Add to favourite . Tell a friend .
Back to top

Top of page

drcameronSend an Instant Message to drcameron  




Credits: 1136

My Scrapbook


Quick Scroll This is ridiculous!!! 02.10.08 (11 months ago) #9

Why are you guys coming to such ridiculous conclusions???
This is no way to come to the conclusion that the answer key was wrong..everybody's upset with the result...but i think the toppers shouldnt bear the brunt of our frustrations...
All the topics on MH-CET are preoccupied just with fights...this should stop somewhere...
Post Options: Add to favourite . Tell a friend .
Back to top

Top of page

 Page 1 of 1
Thread Information  :  Email this thread  :  Printer Friendly  :  Terms of Service  
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version

Related Discussion Topics
DM MEDICAL ONCOLOGY PREPARATION THREAD!!! - 13 replies
LIBRARY : WOMEN'S HEALTH RESEARCH, NEWS & REVIEWS - 36 replies
FEEL FREE TO ASK FOR HELP,DONT GET CONFUSED FRIENDS ! - 13 replies
heading for russia medical , engineering . all updated info - 32 replies
What Happened? Such Poor Response in this Forum? Guys Common - 5 replies
Warning: Hurricane Rita and RxPG Servers - 21 replies
Information Exchange on USMLE Step 1 for 2006 - 295 replies
STATE RANKER! DO YOU FEEL CHEATED ? - 0 replies
Passing PLAB as well as MRCP Part 1 gets you Job!!!!!!!!!!! - 24 replies
application question-send form 183 from office of official - 2 replies
no jobs yet - 16 replies
Docs ready to feel the pulse of rural US - 0 replies
Thread Options: Quick Reply  :  Start New Topic  :  Printer Friendly Version  :  Add this post to My Forum

Home -> Forums -> Maharashtra -> Is there any Computer Mistake for PGM – CET 2008?
Server Status: LOW LOAD, 183 pages served in last minute. Page generation time: 1.211 seconds



Site Maps: [Books] [News] [Forums] [Reviews] [Mnemonics]

sitemap - top30 - centuries - testimonials


About Us :: Disclaimer :: Contact Us :: Report Abuse :: Terms of Services :: Privacy Policy

Advertise with RxPG!

What is XML?

Made in India by RxPG Medical Solutions Private Limited