Page 1 of 1: its a gambling business

dr_sandeep · Credits: 327 My Scrapbook

im following closely each and every session of manipal entrance this year. what the bloody hell these MAHE people were doing at one session they will give all repeats in another session they will give all numericals scientists names what they r expecting i dont know they r cheating they r playing games with innocent students

Dr_Firaz · Credits: 12227 My Scrapbook

srinudsv · Credits: 3633 My Scrapbook

dear friend i toooo agree with u. i hope they vill change d ranking proceedure. lets vait n c.

MHPGCET · Credits: 2950 My Scrapbook

Is there any Computer Mistake for PGM – CET 2008?

To all students who have appeared in PGM -CET 2008.

I feel that there is a computer reading mistake in the results of PGM-CET 2008.

Life of thousands of hard working MBBS graduates are at stake.

Please check Marks of first 50 merit list students.

Out of which some are new but there are many repeaters which means they have appeared in PGM – CET 2007.

Most of them have scored poorly in PGM – CET 2007 & their merit list numbers where very far behind.

I do agree that some may be able to do well in 2008 but without exception all merit list students who are in 1 to 50 rankers in 2008 have scored very poorly in previous year exam PGM- CET 2007.

I give details of all merit list holders who are repeaters this year 2008.

Merit List Rank – 2008. Their rank in 2007.
07 1017
09 217
10 1320
14 578
15 2103
17 1279
18 1098
19 1394
24 562
25 849
27 1978
28 1449
29 814
30 377
32 2460
36 1031
38 1018
39 1133
40 891
41 540
42 2740
43 711
44 511
45 1171
46 690
47 564
50 412

Balance rankers are NEW (1st time appeared so we can not compare their merit)

You may check further list of merit rankers and will be surprised with their previous (PGM-CET 2007) performance.

It seems there may be Computer mistake in OMR reading.

If you observe you will find that your marks may have been interchanged with next or previous Roll No.

(This can be checked by comparing their previous performance in 2007 vis-a-vis your 2007 performance)

Please check your self & if not satisfied opt. for verification immediately.

This is purely my observation and I have mentioned it purely on humanity ground I do not intend to blame anybody and also I do not intend to hurt any feelings of present merit list holders.

Your Well wisher.

drada · Credits: 45802 My Scrapbook My Reading List 2 Books

hawahawai · Credits: 607 My Scrapbook

manipal administration is [bleep] shit,,,,@#@@###
they dnt nw how to conduct fair exams,they r just pretending,and they r calling them deemed university,manipal my foot,,,,,
thats y they r not getting mci recognition,,,i have writen to mci,i hope they derecognise manipal fully,so they stop playing with students life,,,

MHPGCET · Credits: 2950 My Scrapbook

You & your Family have scarified a lot for PG career.

Do not let injustice ruin your sacrifice.

4 marks or 40 marks ? ……who knows ?

They said there is no mistakes in the results, now commits , YES , there is a mistakes of 4 questions.

HOW TO TRUST?

Let us demand:

1. Publishing of all versions of question papers along with there respective Answer Keys on their websites

2. Copy of Answer sheets of all students be dispatched individually or students can collect from respective notified centers.

This will provide absolute transparency.

		Sign In New User? Sign Up Sign in to access your control panel and messenger!
				TechZone \| SpiderNevi \| HowTo? \| Scrapbook!