| A 25 year old person sustained injury in right eye. He developed right corneal opacity following the injury. Left eye was already having poor vision. Corneoplasty of right eye was done and vision was restored. Medicolegally such injury is labeled as: |
| Grievous |
|
100% |
[ 10 ] |
| Simple |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Dangerous |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Serious |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 10 |
|
|
Author
|
Message
|
Bruno
Credits:
44569
My Scrapbook
My Reading List
50 Books
|
FM - Injury to Eye!
|
01.11.04 (4 years ago)
#1
|
|
What do you say for this
-----------------------
Admin:
Question is from AIPGE
2004
The discussion link in previouspapers.com is
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
akanksha
Credits:
41227
My Scrapbook
My Reading List
14 Books
|
|
|
01.12.04 (4 years ago)
#2
|
|
permanent deprivation of vision of either eye is griveous,na!
the vision was restored only after the treatment.
the injury was griveous. 
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
Bruno
Credits:
44569
My Scrapbook
My Reading List
50 Books
|
|
|
01.12.04 (4 years ago)
#3
|
|
How can a vision that is restored be called as PERMANENT LOSS
As far as my English knowledge is concerned....... If you loose your purse and get it again that is Temporary Loss
If you loose your purse and DON'T get it again it is PERMANENT LOSS
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
Bruno
Credits:
44569
My Scrapbook
My Reading List
50 Books
|
|
|
01.13.04 (4 years ago)
#4
|
|
If I stab you and You die without treatment, I am arrested for MURDER
If I stab you, and you are treated, and you are alive... I can be arrested for ATTEMPTED Murder
Because You WERE treated and YOU didn't die, the section under which I am booked CHANGES !!!!
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
Bruno
Credits:
44569
My Scrapbook
My Reading List
50 Books
|
|
|
01.13.04 (4 years ago)
#5
|
|
So far 8 persons have voted for this poll and all have said Grievious
Now tell me.......
The Vision was RESTORED.... What is the Injury
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
findjag
Credits:
2236
My Scrapbook
|
|
injury
|
01.13.04 (4 years ago)
#6
|
|
|
since the patient developed opacity it should be a perforating or penetrating injury.
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
DRMANOJ
Credits:
512
My Scrapbook
|
|
|
01.13.04 (4 years ago)
#7
|
|
|
well as people above said that having a permanent loss of vision is what is considered grevious in the section but since this person has had a restored sight it may not be but then in the wake of the fact that the other eye(the left) ws also not ina good condition for vision this can be considered a grivious injury isnt it??what say people???
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
Guest
Credits:
77491
My Scrapbook
My Reading List
262569 Books
|
|
|
01.13.04 (4 years ago)
#8
|
|
THe other eye is NOT related to this INJURY.......
Just because he had no other eye will not alter the nature of THIS INJURY. That is very sure........
That fact is a confusa
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
akanksha
Credits:
41227
My Scrapbook
My Reading List
14 Books
|
|
|
01.13.04 (4 years ago)
#9
|
|
| Quote: |
If I stab you and You die without treatment, I am arrested for MURDER
If I stab you, and you are treated, and you are alive... I can be arrested for ATTEMPTED Murder
Because You WERE treated and YOU didn't die, the section under which I am booked CHANGES !!!! |
i got angry,n pushed u frm 4th floor,
u din die,so i cannot be taken for a MURDER.
but u fractured ur femur in the process.
so i can be held for griveous injury.
but u got treated,n fracture was reduced,
n u can walk normally after the treatment
do you think,i din do a griveous hurt on u????
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
akanksha
Credits:
41227
My Scrapbook
My Reading List
14 Books
|
|
|
01.13.04 (4 years ago)
#10
|
|
section 320 IPC,CLAUSE 7:
ther is a nice example given in this clause,
"where the accussed threw his wife from a window about 6th feet high,but the fall broken by a weather-board fixed just below it and resulted in the fracture of the knee-pan and in several small wounds,it was held that he was guilty of causing griveous hurt"
do u think here,
the fracture wasnt reducible?or the joint mobility could not be restored after TREATMENT?
similarly,
in the question
whether or not the vision was restored finally,with treatment,the injury was griveous.
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Topic Tags: 
