| A 25 year old person sustained injury in right eye. He developed right corneal opacity following the injury. Left eye was already having poor vision. Corneoplasty of right eye was done and vision was restored. Medicolegally such injury is labeled as: |
| Grievous |
|
100% |
[ 10 ] |
| Simple |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Dangerous |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Serious |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 10 |
|
|
Author
|
Message
|
Anil Aggrawal
Credits:
77531
My Scrapbook
My Reading List
262569 Books
|
|
01.15.04 (4 years ago)
#31
|
|
January 15,2004
My dear Himanshu,
Check your mailbox. It is full. I need to communicate with you, and the mail always returns, saying the mailbox is full. It was interesting talking to this precocious group, especially our good old Bruno. I am sure, he would one day be a great doctor. God bless all of you in the list!
P.S. Don't forget to give me more questions pertaining to Forensic
medicine and toxicology!
Regards
Anil
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
sumitseth
Credits:
77531
My Scrapbook
My Reading List
262569 Books
|
|
Forensic
|
11.21.04 (3 years ago)
#32
|
|
Hi,
this Q is straight forward
clause two Sec 320 I.P.C says Permanent privation of sight of either eye
The catch is If there had been no treatment this loss is permanent.
Permanence is irrespective of Medical intervention
Sumit seth
Author
Review of Forensic
Medicine
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
friendy
Credits:
736
My Scrapbook
|
|
|
11.21.04 (3 years ago)
#33
|
|
|
ofcourse it is grevious bc its matter of vision
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
troubledsoul
Credits:
1132
My Scrapbook
|
|
|
11.21.04 (3 years ago)
#34
|
|
I think the last clause " any hurt which endangers life.or which causes the victim to be in severe bodily apin .or unable to follow his ordinary pursuits for a period of 20 days" makes it a GRIEVOUS HURT
Cheers--
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
bestpsy_2002
Credits:
855
My Scrapbook
|
|
|
05.02.05 (3 years ago)
#35
|
|
well does that mean that if i break someones elbow joint, and he gets it repaired, then i ve not commited an act of grevious injury
plzz clarify prof anil
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
superashdoc
Credits:
25934
My Scrapbook
My Reading List
56 Books
|
|
|
02.01.06 (2 years ago)
#36
|
|
|
It is not grievous because only one eye developed opacity .it is only coincidence that the persons other eye is poor.opacity in one eye will not cause inability to do daily chores for 20days.I think its not grievous.
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
amitgupta
Credits:
20868
My Scrapbook
|
|
|
04.17.06 (2 years ago)
#37
|
|
If the eye had not been treated, it would have amounted to permanent loss of vision..
Thats why its a grievious injury
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
amitgupta
Credits:
20868
My Scrapbook
|
|
|
04.17.06 (2 years ago)
#38
|
|
If the eye had not been treated, it would have amounted to permanent loss of vision..
Thats why its a grievious injury
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
paddy241981
Credits:
1628
My Scrapbook
|
|
|
04.17.06 (2 years ago)
#39
|
|
|
it is grevious injury
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
zolt
Credits:
9171
My Scrapbook
My Reading List
40 Books
|
|
|
05.26.06 (2 years ago)
#40
|
|
|
yes. no doubts, grievous injury.
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Topic Tags: 
