Page 1 of 2: Analysis:UPSC CMS-2007

medicofarhan · Credits: 1904 My Scrapbook

Paper one was pretty cool

. Anybody who has done the all india and AIIMS question banks must have found it easy. Second paper was a real eye opener

and I am seriously reviewing my preparation for those subjects. Its really scary considering that I have only one month to go for my state entrance.

Whats interesting is that cms-2006 analysis thread has more or less same opinion abt the papers. So may be its usual for the UPSC guys to give a tough second paper.

So more reviews awaited................

drshmi · Credits: 4702 My Scrapbook My Reading List 4 Books

it was an easy one. but they had put some real good questions.

rajesh23 · Credits: 2297 My Scrapbook

Hi,
overall standard of paper is good ,it is a good wakeup call for all those writing entrances in coming months.most of the Q were matching the following .

polymorpheus · Credits: 2012 My Scrapbook

Yup!It was business as usual at the UPSC xams:
Paper I-Cool as ice
Paper II-tough as nails

Funny thing,this time of the year brings the sudden and shocking
realisation that one doesn't really know much abt sucjects like Pedia
& OBG.....

Lets discuss Paper-II and c whether we can make sense of the mess !!!

mastdoc2007 · Credits: 2774 My Scrapbook

PAPER 2 WAS real eye opener,,but some easy q s too

medicofarhan · Credits: 1904 My Scrapbook

Has been just checking the gynobs answers. And i think its was a combition of both few tough question and my under preparation.
And I also checked the scores of people who made it to UPSC , in one of the threads, and nobody scored more in paper 2 than one. In most cases there was a good 20 marks difference.

drshmi · Credits: 4702 My Scrapbook My Reading List 4 Books

Although paper 2 was not so easy, it was easier to find the answers by ruling out other options.

Let's discuss the ones we found difficult.

To start with,
which one of the following deficiencies causes corneal vascularization, poor growth and photophobia
a. riboflavin
b. pyridoxine
c. niacin
d. thiamine
I'm clueless regarding this one.

Another thing friends. Any idea why the q papers were not sealed? i was surprised to see that!!

drshmi · Credits: 4702 My Scrapbook My Reading List 4 Books

Which one of the following intervention studies on CAD did not observe significant changes in mortality or risk factors since the control group was not properly chosen

a. stanford- 3 community study
b. the north kerelia project
c. multi risk factor intervention trial
d. lipid research clinic study

medicofarhan · Credits: 1904 My Scrapbook

corneal vascularisation-riboflavin,
intervention study with no significant changes-MRFIT..........
Yep even i was surprised that q papers were not sealed, even a mock test is conducted with a bit more security. Just hope there isnt anything fishy.

drshmi · Credits: 4702 My Scrapbook My Reading List 4 Books

any reference for the first q buddy? i have been searching biochem + ophthal books but didnt get it anywhere..

		Sign In New User? Sign Up Sign in to access your control panel and messenger!
				TechZone \| SpiderNevi \| HowTo? \| Scrapbook!