|
Author
|
Message
|
pendid
Credits:
2190
My Scrapbook
|
tn2008-rank list
|
03.11.08 (4 months ago)
#1
|
|
hi buddies,
just post sl no, marks and experience marks of those whom you know and yours, ofcourse. lets try forming a ranklist in this thread.
let me start it.
sl no. marks +
1. 52+ 69.12 2
2. 450+ 65.5 5
3. 900+ 61 9
4. 65+ 68.4 3
5. 36-39 69.4 3
6. 9 72.13 1
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
basky
Credits:
494
My Scrapbook
|
|
|
03.11.08 (4 months ago)
#2
|
|
my score 69.48
srl.no;35
experience marks;8
total:77.48
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
pendid
Credits:
2190
My Scrapbook
|
|
|
03.12.08 (4 months ago)
#3
|
|
| basky wrote: |
my score 69.48
srl.no;35
experience marks;8
total:77.48 |
hi, basky
Thats GREAT! Big congrats to you. You must be within top five, i suppose. Are you a private candidate or service candidate?
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
pendid
Credits:
2190
My Scrapbook
|
|
|
03.12.08 (4 months ago)
#4
|
|
Hi Docs,
I request all of you to furnish info. regarding the status (whether private or service) and also the community, he/ she/they belong to, if possible. That would give the readers, a better idea.
come on! make it fast......
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
pendid
Credits:
2190
My Scrapbook
|
|
|
03.12.08 (4 months ago)
#5
|
|
One more from my side....
sl.no 15 has +5...... sorry, i dont have info reg. his status or community. Anyway his score including experience marks is above 77.
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
kasi72k
Credits:
320
My Scrapbook
|
|
|
03.12.08 (4 months ago)
#6
|
|
i have collected the following marks witout the sevice marks and serial no
mark and serial no
62.64 527
62.64 526
63.72 446
64.44 370
66.6 173
68.04 97
63.72 445
65.52 230
65.16 296
66.24 203
68.76 55
68.04 83
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
kasi72k
Credits:
320
My Scrapbook
|
|
|
03.12.08 (4 months ago)
#7
|
|
we can reasonably conclude if we calculate the proportion of service and non service candidates within 500 ranks and their service marks from last years merit list. this is what i have compiled
those who have
10 marks--19 persons within 500 ranks
9 marks--7 persons
8 marks--17 persons
7 marks--21 persons
6 marks--24 persons
5 marks--44 persons
4 marks--59 persons
3 marks---30
2 marks--88 persons only nonservice candidates
1 mark--184 persons--only nonservice candidates
0 marks--33 persons--only nonservice candidates
this years data will also not deviate much from the data above according to pure statistics.
so from the above data one can reasonably conclude teir rank from their current marks.
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
pendid
Credits:
2190
My Scrapbook
|
|
|
03.12.08 (4 months ago)
#8
|
|
| kasi72k wrote: |
i have collected the following marks witout the sevice marks and serial no
mark and serial no
62.64 527
62.64 526
63.72 446
64.44 370
66.6 173
68.04 97
63.72 445
65.52 230
65.16 296
66.24 203
68.76 55
68.04 83 |
hi kasi72k,
You have posted the sl.no and marks of 12 candidates. But without their experience marks, pri/ser status or community , it is difficult to get the full benefit from your post. Do try finding it. that will benefit us a lot.
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
pendid
Credits:
2190
My Scrapbook
|
|
|
03.12.08 (4 months ago)
#9
|
|
| kasi72k wrote: |
i have collected the following marks witout the sevice marks and serial no
mark and serial no
62.64 527
62.64 526
63.72 446
64.44 370
66.6 173
68.04 97
63.72 445
65.52 230
65.16 296
66.24 203
68.76 55
68.04 83 |
hi kasi72k,
You have posted the sl.no and marks of 12 candidates. But without their experience marks, pri/ser status or community , it is difficult to get the full benefit from your post. Do try finding it. that will benefit us a lot.
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
pendid
Credits:
2190
My Scrapbook
|
|
|
03.12.08 (4 months ago)
#10
|
|
| kasi72k wrote: |
this years data will also not deviate much from the data above according to pure statistics.
so from the above data one can reasonably conclude teir rank from their current marks. |
1. You have taken time to collect so much info of last year's counselling and post in this thread. A good effort,I should say.
2. I would like to tell you something regarding this. Last year, a fresh set of service candidates, recruited three years back,i think 2003, were eligible for tnpgmee2007. So there was a tough competition and a lot of service candidates cruised into the top500. There was no service exam
in the next year, i.e., 2004. This is what i was told. So i dont expect so many service candidates within top 500. Thus, calculating from last year's list will not give us a fair idea regarding our rank.
This is what i feel..... Do correct me if i m wrong.
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Topic Tags: 
