Page 1 of 2: Didays law

Nitwit · Credits: 1952 My Scrapbook

With repeated pregnancies a syphitic mother improves on her past performance this is known as-
1.Colies law
2.Diday or kassowitz law
3Hutchinsons law
4None

well the book says ans is 2.Justt wanted to confirm on that

2shar · Credits: 7830 My Scrapbook

yeh kassowitz law is correct.

in fact she undergoes abortion....then stillbirth...then she would hv a baby with congenital syphilis......natures way to postpone pregnancy

sajjanshenoy · Credits: 4274 My Scrapbook

Never knew this ! One more info got from the great RxPG Community !

sajjanshenoy · Credits: 4274 My Scrapbook

By the way, what is this Colies law ?

wondergirl · Credits: 13337 My Scrapbook

draditithegreat · Credits: 1248020 My Scrapbook

colies law isnt the one where mother gets immune ....rest i forgot........
will have to look in to the notes..
gosh..poor memory....

ratnakar_potla · Credits: 5713 My Scrapbook My Reading List 2 Books

can some one says where all such laws were mentioned?

zolt · Credits: 9209 My Scrapbook My Reading List 40 Books

Kassowitz' law states that the longer the duration of untreated infection before pregnancy, the less likely the fetus will be stillborn or infected. Thus, infants born to mothers in the secondary stage of infection are almost always infected, and stillbirths are common. Conversely, infants born to women with late syphilis may be uninfected. If the mother becomes infected late in the pregnancy, she may show no signs before delivery, and the infected newborn may also appear normal at birth. Unfortunately, this is common, so if a woman has untreated syphilis at delivery, it must be assumed that the infant is infected and must be treated. Stillbirths, although common, are only reported as such after a 20-week gestation.

cyrus_Y_rus · Credits: 2679 My Scrapbook

colles' law : A child born to a mother who has no signs of venereal symptoms, and presents with this disease at the age of a few weeks, will infect the healthiest nursemaid, but not its mother. The observation had been made earlier by Simon de Vellembert in 1565. This law from the time before the discovery of Spirochaeta pallida is based upon clinical observations. His conclusion was wrong, however, as Colles was ignorant of the fact that the mother already had the disease

cyrus_Y_rus · Credits: 2679 My Scrapbook

n ,thats what aditi gr8 ,,,,,,''sonnn'' ,,,,was telling abt ,,,,,as ,,,,,,,mothers get immune ,,,,,,,

		Sign In New User? Sign Up Sign in to access your control panel and messenger!
				TechZone \| SpiderNevi \| HowTo? \| Scrapbook!