|
Author
|
Message
|
sravya
Credits:
28740
My Scrapbook
|
biostats - i found this one tough plzz explain it!
|
01.18.06 (2 years ago)
#1
|
|
a city with a population of 1,000,000.
10,000 have disesase x. there are 1000 new cases of disease x and 200 deaths each year from the disease. there are 2500 deaths per year from all causes. assuming no net emigration from or immigration to the city the incidence of disease x in this city is given by which of the following?
a) 200/1,000,000
b) 800/1,000,000
c) 1000/990,000
d) 2500/1,000,000
e) 10,000/990,000
f) 10,000/1,000,000
|
|
|
Post Options:
Add to favourite
.
Tell a friend
.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
dr4jc
Credits:
4396
My Scrapbook
|
|
01.18.06 (2 years ago)
#2
|
|
|
ans is b? cuz 1000-200 gives 800 new cases alive(incidence of the disease)... 200/2500 would give disease specific fatality rate...10,000/1,000,000 would be the point prevalence at the start...
|
|
|
Post Options:
Add to favourite
.
Tell a friend
.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
ratnakar_potla
Credits:
5703
My Scrapbook
My Reading List
2 Books
|
|
01.18.06 (2 years ago)
#3
|
|
atleast i am sure there is error in the question either u typed or u saw.!!!!!!!!!
I am afraid if some one gives a fair explanation for the above the concept of incidence needs a revamp
|
|
|
Post Options:
Add to favourite
.
Tell a friend
.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
bharatvedin
Credits:
4094
My Scrapbook
|
|
01.18.06 (2 years ago)
#4
|
|
HI,
THERE IS NOPTHING WRONG IN THE Q.....
WAT IS INCIDENCE.....?
INCIDENCE IS NO OF NEW CASES ADDED TO A POPULATIOM IN A TIME PERIOD.....
INCIDENCE= NO OF NEW CASES ADDED TO A POPULATION/AT RISK INDIVISUAL
SO THE NO OF NEW CASES IS 1000
THE POPULATION AT RISK WUD BE= 1000000-10000=990000
AS 10000 PEOPLE R ALREADY HAVIN THE DS THEY WONT B AT RISK....
SO PEOPLE AT RISK WUD BE 990000.
HENCE INCIDENCE WUD B= 1000/990000
IT HAS NOTHIN TO DO WID DEATHS AS DEATH WUD AFFECT THE PREVLANCE NOT THE INCIDENCE......
THANX!
|
|
|
Post Options:
Add to favourite
.
Tell a friend
.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
dr4jc
Credits:
4396
My Scrapbook
|
|
01.18.06 (2 years ago)
#5
|
|
|
thanks for the clarification Bharat the answer should be C
|
|
|
Post Options:
Add to favourite
.
Tell a friend
.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
ratnakar_potla
Credits:
5703
My Scrapbook
My Reading List
2 Books
|
|
01.24.06 (2 years ago)
#6
|
|
there again as i said thats a new concept of incidence.
I am sorry to say that atleast i dont accept with your logic of "at risk population".
The ones who had disease are also a part of the population and they were "at risk".
ref: park pg-55
|
|
|
Post Options:
Add to favourite
.
Tell a friend
.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
sravya
Credits:
28740
My Scrapbook
|
c is the answer!
|
01.25.06 (2 years ago)
#7
|
|
yes! c is the answer!
but how come those having disease can be at risk, if they have already disease?
gudluck!
bye!
|
|
|
Post Options:
Add to favourite
.
Tell a friend
.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
sprite
Credits:
762
My Scrapbook
|
|
01.29.06 (2 years ago)
#8
|
|
c is the answer....
ppl with the dz are not at risk ...
|
|
|
Post Options:
Add to favourite
.
Tell a friend
.
|
|
Back to top
|
|