|
Author
|
Message
|
jayanta
Credits:
35603
My Scrapbook
My Reading List
45 Books
|
obstetrics-delivery
|
10.22.06 (1 year ago)
#1
|
|
IN A WOMAN WITH PREVIOUS CAESARIAN SECTION ,NOT AN INDICATION OF CAESARIAN SECTION:
1.OCCIPITOPOSTERIOR POSITION.
2.FETAL DISTRESS.
3.BREECH.
4.MIDPELVIC CONNTRACTION.
AS PER THE RULE POST C/'S PREGNANCY IS DEALT WITH C/S.
SO THE ANSWER MUST BE NONE.
BUT THEY HAVE ASKED FOR A SINGLE ANSWER.
IT IS AN AIIMS
QUESTION.
PLEASE HELP MY FRIENDS.
REGARDS.
THANKX.
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
ujwals
Credits:
4860
My Scrapbook
|
|
10.27.06 (1 year ago)
#2
|
|
dutta says previous scar (like cs) is a relative indication
in pr of scar cs is indicated when complications arise like MALPRESENTATION, APH , FETAL DISTRESS ,recurrent condition (CPD)
so ans is none but if i have ans, i'll go for breech
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
ujwals
Credits:
4860
My Scrapbook
|
|
10.27.06 (1 year ago)
#3
|
|
|
so ans is none but if i have TO ans, i'll go for breech
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
ortho_obsessed
Credits:
110
My Scrapbook
|
|
05.16.07 (1 year ago)
#4
|
|
|
I'll go for breech too,unless of course its a footling breech
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
prolene
Credits:
5531
My Scrapbook
|
|
05.17.07 (1 year ago)
#5
|
|
4. Midpelvic contraction.
If a patient had a previous CS, then presence of any of the above would be an absolute indication for CS except Midpelvic contraction.
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
cingulate_gyrus2006
Credits:
22810
My Scrapbook
|
|
05.17.07 (1 year ago)
#6
|
|
|
What about occipito posterior presentation...
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
gunjan83
Credits:
3767
My Scrapbook
My Reading List
1 Books
|
|
05.18.07 (1 year ago)
#7
|
|
|
why would occipitoposterior postion be reason for c.s? i think it shud be occipitoposterior position.
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
prolene
Credits:
5531
My Scrapbook
|
|
05.18.07 (1 year ago)
#8
|
|
Its not midpelvic contraction (Hiding), i was wrong (Prepares to run), its Occipito posterior position (Runs away), I'll be back with more knowledge.
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
jayanta
Credits:
35603
My Scrapbook
My Reading List
45 Books
|
|
06.05.07 (1 year ago)
#9
|
|
OOO---OOO---PPP---SSS---.............
WHAT A CONFUSION!
PLEASE HAVE A CONCRETE FINAL ANSWER.
REGARDS.
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
prolene
Credits:
5531
My Scrapbook
|
|
06.05.07 (1 year ago)
#10
|
|
The answer is Occipito-posterior position:
66% of cases with OP position will deliver as OA, 12% will deliver spontaneoulsy as face to pubes and rest of the cases:
1. Some may require an episiotmy if occipito-frontal diameter is distending the perineum.
2. Internal roatation may be interrupted by prominent ischial spines or may be restricted by reduced pelvic diameters e.g. android pelvis, delivery then has to be completed by section or if full dilatation has taken place then Manual or Forecep delivery can be done.
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|