see your advertisement here
Mobile (PDA) gre ielts gpvts mrcgp mrcog mrcp mrcpath mrcpch mrcs plab toefl usmle Forums FAQ | Help

RxPG - the perfect Rx for medical Post Graduate entrance blues!
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
Sign in to access your control panel and messenger!
 

TechZone | SpiderNevi | HowTo? | Scrapbook!

    

DocIndia Forum - Site Related Discussions - Shouts - Library - Lists - Categories  

 Revision Tools: Eponyms Facts Diseases Syndromes Pathognomics Images Crammer Vocabulary PreviousPapers OSCE Busters GRE
 Features Forums Articles Downloads Mnemonics Dictionary Reviews Videos Submit Articles

ZONES>> Hot : MBBS : PrePG : MCQs : Careers : Alt+C : UK : USA : Australia : Canada : Global : OffBeat!

 [ Customise this Navigation Bar ]

Alerts - Study Partner - Answers - Seat Reviews - I See - Search Forums | Top Reads Book Shop  

 
 Home > > Forums Email this page
RxPG :: View topic - Cut-off marks, model answers, individual marks not secrets  
 
PrePG Forum FAQ - Debates - Hot - Unanswered
Page 1 of 1: Cut-off marks, model answers, individual marks not secrets
Thread Info | Related Topics | Wiki Page for This Topic | Topic Tags:
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version
 Page 1 of 1
Author Message
BrunoSend an Instant Message to Bruno  




Credits: 44569

My Scrapbook
My Reading List
50 Books

Quick Scroll Cut-off marks, model answers, individual marks not secrets 11.14.06 (1 year ago) #1

Quote:
A Government panel yesterday asked the Union Public Service Commission to release the marks of all candidates who appeared for the Civil Services (Preliminary) Examination this year.

The Union Public Service Commission (UPSC ) was also told to declare the cut-off within two weeks.

The Central Information Commission order comes on a petition filed by more than 2,000 aspirants who call themselves Transparency Seekers.

The petitioners described the move as a "small victory" as UPSC had refused to furnish model answers to question papers stating it was part of their intellectual property rights.

The aggrieved candidates had filed an application under the Right to Information (RTI) Act in September after the UPSC rejected opening its recruitment process and said it was not ready to show the cut-off marks for selection of candidates.


UPSC cat has been belled
What about the AIIMS Cat
Post Options: Reply Add Forward Report New
Back to top

Top of page


4nkitSend an Instant Message to 4nkit  




Credits: 1881

My Scrapbook


Quick Scroll 08.26.07 (10 months ago) #2

even a small victory counts... cut-offs should be made public ... it will help us all n also maintain the transperanc y n trust in the system...
Post Options: Reply Add Forward Report New
Back to top

Top of page

MHPGCETSend an Instant Message to MHPGCET  




Credits: 2950

My Scrapbook


Quick Scroll Is there any Computer Mistake for PGM – CET 2008? 02.08.08 (4 months ago) #3

Is there any Computer Mistake for PGM – CET 2008?

To all students who have appeared in PGM -CET 2008.

I feel that there is a computer reading mistake in the results of PGM-CET 2008.

Life of thousands of hard working MBBS graduates are at stake.

Please check Marks of first 50 merit list students.

Out of which some are new but there are many repeaters which means they have appeared in PGM – CET 2007.

Most of them have scored poorly in PGM – CET 2007 & their merit list numbers where very far behind.

I do agree that some may be able to do well in 2008 but without exception all merit list students who are in 1 to 50 rankers in 2008 have scored very poorly in previous year exam PGM- CET 2007.

I give details of all merit list holders who are repeaters this year 2008.

Merit List Rank – 2008. Their rank in 2007.
07 1017
09 217
10 1320
14 578
15 2103
17 1279
18 1098
19 1394
24 562
25 849
27 1978
28 1449
29 814
30 377
32 2460
36 1031
38 1018
39 1133
40 891
41 540
42 2740
43 711
44 511
45 1171
46 690
47 564
50 412

Balance rankers are NEW (1st time appeared so we can not compare their merit)

You may check further list of merit rankers and will be surprised with their previous (PGM-CET 2007) performance.

It seems there may be Computer mistake in OMR reading.

If you observe you will find that your marks may have been interchanged with next or previous Roll No.

(This can be checked by comparing their previous performance in 2007 vis-a-vis your 2007 performance)

Please check your self & if not satisfied opt. for verification immediately.

This is purely my observation and I have mentioned it purely on humanity ground I do not intend to blame anybody and also I do not intend to hurt any feelings of present merit list holders.

Your Well wisher.
Post Options: Reply Add Forward Report New
Back to top

Top of page

 Page 1 of 1
Thread Information  :  Email this thread  :  Printer Friendly  :  Terms of Service  
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version

Related Discussion Topics
Alert: Shortage of 200,000 Doctors Predicted in US - 26 replies
RxPG Website Landmarks Thread - 47 replies
DoH Identifies over 23,000 training posts in UK - 0 replies
RxPG: 30,000+ Members and Counting! - 0 replies
write an exam, earn rs. 60 000!! - 4 replies
2,000 newly qualified medics in Britain unemployed - 0 replies
Australia seeks 20,000 skilled migrants - 0 replies
Australia - Migrant intake to be boosted by 6,000 - 9 replies
Boost for NHS refugee recruitment - 3 replies
UK Govt to axe 5,000 jobs in NHS - 0 replies
54,000 migrants to come to Britain - 0 replies
plab - NHS sees 60,000 rise in staff numbers - 0 replies
Thread Options: Quick Reply  :  Start New Topic  :  Printer Friendly Version  :  Add this post to My Forum

Home -> Forums -> PrePG -> Cut-off marks, model answers, individual marks not secrets
Server Status: LOW LOAD, 117 pages served in last minute. Page generation time: 1.913 seconds



Site Maps: [Books] [News] [Forums] [Reviews] [Mnemonics]

sitemap - top30 - centuries - testimonials


About Us :: Disclaimer :: Contact Us :: Report Abuse :: Terms of Services :: Privacy Policy

Advertise with RxPG!

What is XML?

Made in India by RxPG Medical Solutions Private Limited