| HOW FAIR WERE THE RESULTS OF AIPGEE 2007 |
| VERY VERY FAIR(I GOT A RANK MYSELF) |
|
6% |
[ 2 ] |
| I BELIEVE IN THE RESULTS COMPLETELY |
|
25% |
[ 8 ] |
| SOMETHING WRONG FOR SURE(WITNESSED WHAT IS POSTED) |
|
68% |
[ 22 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 32 |
|
|
Author
|
Message
|
rohkav12
Credits:
2777
My Scrapbook
|
SOMETHING IS CERTAINLY GOING WRONG IN THIS WHOLE AIPG THING
|
03.03.07 (1 year ago)
#1
|
|
GUYS
I DONO KNOW WHETHER U WILL AGREE WITH ME OR NOT....BUT WHAT I HAVE NOTICED IS THAT THERE IS CERTAINLY SOMETHING WRONG WITH THE AIPGE
RESULTS THIS YEAR OR AS A MATTER OF FACT EVERY YEAR...
WELL I HAVE FELT THIS ATLEAST IN MY COLLEGE.....ALL THE STUDENTS WHO HAVE HAD APPEARED FOR THE AIPGE
...HOLD UR BREATH ...ONLY THOSE HAVE MADE IT WHO WERE LEAST EXPECTED TO DO SO....I MEAN WITH ALL DUE RESPECT TO EVERYBODY....I DONT WANT TO UNDO THEIR EFFORTS BUT ONLY IF "THEY DID THE HARD WORK"....MOST OF THESE STUDENTS WERE THOSE WHO HAD ATLEAST TWO SUPPLEMENTARIES TO THEIR CREDITS...AND ALL GENUINE STD. WHO THOUGHT OF MAKING IT NEVER EVEN GET A PEICE OF THE RESULTS...
I MEAN IF AFTER SO MUCH QUOTA THING IF SOME MISCREANTS R PLAYING WITH OUR CARRER N LIFE SOMETHING MUST ME DONE....THIS HAS TO BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF SOME RESPONSIBLE PERSON.........
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
fdcc
Credits:
5017
My Scrapbook
My Reading List
1 Books
|
|
03.03.07 (1 year ago)
#2
|
|
|
ya i agree
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
Bruno
Credits:
44755
My Scrapbook
My Reading List
50 Books
|
|
03.03.07 (1 year ago)
#3
|
|
That is not surprising
Any one who mugged up the last 3 years mudhit khanna and aashish gupta ANSWERS (not even explanations) would have got a rank in AIPG this time....
All those who had read text books will have to prepare again
That is because of the repeats
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
kan
Credits:
4066
My Scrapbook
|
Re: SOMETHING IS CERTAINLY GOING WRONG IN THIS WHOLE AIPG TH
|
03.03.07 (1 year ago)
#4
|
|
| rohkav12 wrote: |
GUYS
I DONO KNOW WHETHER U WILL AGREE WITH ME OR NOT....BUT WHAT I HAVE NOTICED IS THAT THERE IS CERTAINLY SOMETHING WRONG WITH THE <a href="http://www.rxpgonline.com/forum2.html">AIPGE
</a>
RESULTS THIS YEAR OR AS A MATTER OF FACT EVERY YEAR...
WELL I HAVE FELT THIS ATLEAST IN MY COLLEGE.....ALL THE STUDENTS WHO HAVE HAD APPEARED FOR THE <a href="http://www.rxpgonline.com/forum2.html">AIPGE
</a>
...HOLD UR BREATH ...ONLY THOSE HAVE MADE IT WHO WERE LEAST EXPECTED TO DO SO....I MEAN WITH ALL DUE RESPECT TO EVERYBODY....I DONT WANT TO UNDO THEIR EFFORTS BUT ONLY IF "THEY DID THE HARD WORK"....MOST OF THESE STUDENTS WERE THOSE WHO HAD ATLEAST TWO SUPPLEMENTARIES TO THEIR CREDITS...AND ALL GENUINE STD. WHO THOUGHT OF MAKING IT NEVER EVEN GET A PEICE OF THE RESULTS...
I MEAN IF AFTER SO MUCH QUOTA THING IF SOME MISCREANTS R PLAYING WITH OUR CARRER N LIFE SOMETHING MUST ME DONE....THIS HAS TO BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF SOME RESPONSIBLE PERSON......... |
i agree with you....even the same happened in my college...i know many people who gpt excellent results in AIIMS
n pgi couldnot get themselves in the list or got a rank around 1000..it can't be possible if everything have been done fairly unless these people got some illness leading to acute dementia...the same happened with me..but we simply can't do anything....n to add to the misery the reservation has come...
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
kan
Credits:
4066
My Scrapbook
|
|
03.03.07 (1 year ago)
#5
|
|
| Bruno wrote: |
That is not surprising
Any one who mugged up the last 3 years mudhit khanna and aashish gupta ANSWERS (not even explanations) would have got a rank in AIPG this time....
All those who had read text books will have to prepare again
That is because of the repeats |
i dont agree with you sir....even the hard working people who have read the theory books have also read the previous papers....so i don't think that this is the sole reason of such a result...there is something else which is wrong....my seniors tld me that the result of aipgme is always unpredictable but this year something very gross has happened....
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
tornado97
Credits:
6390
My Scrapbook
My Reading List
14 Books
|
|
03.03.07 (1 year ago)
#6
|
|
|
fate is the most important factor..more than hard work....even if u work hard,if u have ill fate u'll mark wrong answers to even those qns that u knew very well..
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
kan
Credits:
4066
My Scrapbook
|
|
03.03.07 (1 year ago)
#7
|
|
| tornado97 wrote: |
| fate is the most important factor..more than hard work....even if u work hard,if u have ill fate u'll mark wrong answers to even those qns that u knew very well.. |
u are right man...this destiny, i dont know fortunately or unfortunately,has kept many things in its control...u cant do anything against it..n if u try it leads to failure n distress....one bams can earn much more than some md or md docs.....its the destiny.....
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
hardstone007
Credits:
912
My Scrapbook
|
|
03.03.07 (1 year ago)
#8
|
|
friends ,there is a gross miscalculation while calculating our rank,take an example of rank 1500,his calculated rank is 1936 accd roster,
now calculate if its only 22.5 percent quota ,the should have been at the rank 1837,anybody listening,can any body explain this simple maths to me [/b]
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
askrags
Credits:
8539
My Scrapbook
|
|
03.03.07 (1 year ago)
#9
|
|
well just a couple of keys here and there can make large differences.
but anyone who prepares for AIPGE
must already know this. the options are so limited. AIPGE
or abroad(almost only USMLE
left now).
i would not say the results are unpredicable, but its just that the fact that it is unpredicatable, is predictable.
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|
Bruno
Credits:
44755
My Scrapbook
My Reading List
50 Books
|
|
03.04.07 (1 year ago)
#10
|
|
| hardstone007 wrote: |
friends ,there is a gross miscalculation while calculating our rank,take an example of rank 1500,his calculated rank is 1936 accd roster,
now calculate if its only 22.5 percent quota ,the should have been at the rank 1837,anybody listening,can any body explain this simple maths to me [/b] |
Suppose there are 1936 seats
22.5 % of that is reserved.... That means 435.6
77.5 % is not reserved... That is 1500.40 seats not reserved
This has been clearly given in MOHFW 100 point roster...
I am really surprised that a doctor cannot even understand this simple logic.....
This is why we are taken for a ride by politicians and IAS
Officers
And this is why our fellow medicos get carried away by the rumour that rotation roster is better
|
|
|
Post Options:
Reply
Add
Forward
Report
New
|
|
Back to top
|
|