see your advertisement here
Mobile (PDA) gre ielts gpvts mrcgp mrcog mrcp mrcpath mrcpch mrcs plab toefl usmle Forums FAQ | Help

RxPG - the perfect Rx for medical Post Graduate entrance blues!
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
Sign in to access your control panel and messenger!
 

TechZone | SpiderNevi | HowTo? | Scrapbook!

    

DocIndia Forum - Site Related Discussions - Shouts - Library - Lists - Categories  

 Revision Tools: Eponyms Facts Diseases Syndromes Pathognomics Images Crammer Vocabulary PreviousPapers OSCE Busters GRE
 Features Forums Articles Downloads Mnemonics Dictionary Reviews Videos Submit Articles

ZONES>> Hot : MBBS : PrePG : MCQs : Careers : Alt+C : UK : USA : Australia : Canada : Global : OffBeat!

 [ Customise this Navigation Bar ]

Alerts - Study Partner - Answers - Seat Reviews - I See - Search Forums | Top Reads Book Shop  

 
 Home > > Forums Email this page
RxPG :: View topic - UNIX - Year 2038 bug  
 
TechCentral Forum FAQ - Hot - Unasnwered
Page 1 of 1: UNIX - Year 2038 bug
Thread Info | Related Topics | Wiki Page for This Topic | Topic Tags:
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version
 Page 1 of 1
Author Message
docmojoSend an Instant Message to docmojo  




Credits: 803

My Scrapbook


Quick Scroll UNIX - Year 2038 bug 03.15.08 (4 months ago) #1

hey pals, check this wikipedia topic....

"The year 2038 problem (also known as "Unix Millennium bug", "Y2K38," "Y2K+38," or "Y2.038K" by analogy to the Y2K problem) may cause some computer software to fail before or in the year 2038. The problem affects Unix-like operating systems, which represent system time as the number of seconds (ignoring leap seconds) since 00:00:00 January 1, 1970.[1] This representation also affects software written for most other operating systems because of the broad deployment of C. On most 32-bit systems, the time_t data type used to store this second count is a signed 32-bit integer. The latest time that can be represented in this format, following the POSIX standard, is 03:14:07 UTC on Tuesday, January 19, 2038. Times beyond this moment will "wrap around" and be represented internally as a negative number, and cause programs to fail, since they will see these times not as being in 2038 but rather in 1901. Erroneous calculations and decisions may therefore result."

w w w . u n i x 2 0 3 8 . c o m

this is the first time i came across any topic which describes a negative aspect of Unix... considering most of today's servers run on Unix, this could turn out to be a serious problem...

P.S. Linux and MAC operarting systems are Unix based
Post Options: Reply Add Forward Report New
Back to top

Top of page


BGMSend an Instant Message to BGM  




Credits: 104516

My Scrapbook


Quick Scroll 03.16.08 (4 months ago) #2

icon_smile.gif 29 more years are there!
So its not a big matter of concern i think.
The Y2K bug caused the same panic but nothing happened.
After 30 years the whole OS frame work will be changed.
I really doubt whether any of the current OS will survive till 2038.
Post Options: Reply Add Forward Report New
Back to top

Top of page

docmojoSend an Instant Message to docmojo  




Credits: 803

My Scrapbook


Quick Scroll 03.16.08 (4 months ago) #3

yes thats very much true... but the y2k problem which caused much panic was first mentioned in 1985, a good 15 years ahead.... but still it was averted only at the brink... people weren't prepared for it well in advance...

P.S. y2k was a blessing in disguise for us, Indians... it brought our computer specialists to the fore!
hope y2k38 brings us something special too...
Post Options: Reply Add Forward Report New
Back to top

Top of page

 Page 1 of 1
Thread Information  :  Email this thread  :  Printer Friendly  :  Terms of Service  
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Printer-friendly version

Related Discussion Topics
Sticky: [ Poll ] FAQ: How To Plan An Year Of Studies For Pre-PG - 61 replies
paeds---kernicterus - 14 replies
Medicine ,all of the following - 7 replies
Number of patients drop at PMCH - 3 replies
sab number ka pher hai..isoflurane - 2 replies
can anybody give mukul pathhak's contact number - 3 replies
GMC Registration Number = GMC Reference Number? - 2 replies
how to get gmc reference number - 3 replies
can anybody give mukul pathhak's contact number - 0 replies
cmon everybody. help, bcos in it lies ur wellbeing - 12 replies
Record number of doctors registered with GMC in 2003 - 0 replies
Number of overseas doctors in new zealand - 1 replies
Thread Options: Quick Reply  :  Start New Topic  :  Printer Friendly Version  :  Add this post to My Forum

Home -> Forums -> TechCentral -> UNIX - Year 2038 bug
Server Status: LOW LOAD, 163 pages served in last minute. Page generation time: 0.934 seconds



Site Maps: [Books] [News] [Forums] [Reviews] [Mnemonics]

sitemap - top30 - centuries - testimonials


About Us :: Disclaimer :: Contact Us :: Report Abuse :: Terms of Services :: Privacy Policy

Advertise with RxPG!

What is XML?

Made in India by RxPG Medical Solutions Private Limited